Tag Archive | "Fannie Mae"
Posted on 18 June 2010. Tags: agencies, american peasants, austrian economic theory, austrian economics, Big Brother, blog economics, blog political, blog politics, blog real estate, blogging political, blogging real estate, bubble real estate, buyer real estate, buying real estate, capital, capital structure, capitalism, conspiracy theory, crash, debt, debt capital, deflation, department housing urban, Department of Housing and Urban Development, depression, diluting currency, dollar, Economics, economics blog, economics blogging, economics real estate, equity, equity capital, Fannie Mae, federal agencies, federal housing administration, federal national mortgage association, federal reserve, federal reserve flow of funds, feudalism, fha, financing real estate, fiscal policy, FNM, Freddie Mac, government, government policy, great recession, holc, homeowner society, homeowners, homeowners loan corporation, homes, housing, housing bubble, housing bubble crash, housing policy, housing politics, housing recession, HUD, hyperinflation, inflation, institutions, interest rates mortgage, liquidity, monetary policy, mortgage, mortgage interest rates, mortgage rates, mortgages, ownership society, peasants, policy, policy housing, political, political blog, political blogging, political policy, Politics, politics blog, property, public institutions, quantitative easing, rates mortgage, Real Estate, real estate blog, real estate blogging, real estate bubble, real estate bubble crash, real estate buyers, real estate buying, real estate economics, real estate financing, real estate policies, real estate policy, real property, Road to Serfdom, serfdom, serfdom road, theory conspiracy, transfer ownership, U.S. dollar, urban housing, USD
The capital structure of US real estate assets has been in a long process of change. By subsidizing real estate and making mortgage debt artificially cheaper than equity capital, the US government has been effectively transferring real estate ownership from individuals to lending institutions and the Federal Reserve. Here’s how this game has been unfolding, and a warning to Americans that they will one day wake up in a country where most people live as feudalistic peasants, beholden to their banking and political overlords. Continue Reading
Posted in Economics, Politics, Real Estate
Posted on 12 June 2010. Tags: barack obama, blog political, blog real estate, california real estate, class warfare, credit cycle, Economics, Fannie Mae, financial system, fiscal policy, FNM, freedom, home prices, homes manhattan beach, housing policies, housing policy, housing prices, HUD, income manhattan beach, inflation, liberty, manhattan beach, manhattan beach homes, manhattan beach income, manhattan beach property, monetary policy, money, mortgage, mortgage deduction, obama, political blog, political economy, Politics, politics blog, politics real estate, prices housing, Real Estate, real estate blog, real estate economics, real estate prices, real estate tax, Rob Viglione, socal real estate, socalrea, socialism, southern california, tax, tax real estate, taxation
The White House is urging Congress to limit, or cut, the once untouchable tax break for mortgage interest. In traditional class warfare parlance, the White House cap on mortgage interest deductions will fall only upon the wealthy. Let’s not drink the Obama Kool-Aid – the effects of this legislative move will impact everyone.
The Obama administration is proposing reducing deductions for homeowners who earn more than $250,000 pear year. Since I’m a southern California Realtor®, I’ll bring up an example from my local market – the South Bay; in particular, Manhattan Beach, CA.

Chart from LA Times Local Neighborhoods.
Manhattan Beach is a wealthy southern California city, nestled along a prime beach-front location. With 38% of Manhattan Beach residents earning over $125,000 per year, we expect this legislative change will materially impact our local market.
When many home buyers calculate the amount of home they can afford, mortgage interest deductions on income factor heavily into capital service capacity, i.e. how much mortgage they can comfortably afford to pay every month. If a high income earner is in the 34% income tax bracket and has a $5,000 per month mortgage, of which, say, roughly $4,000 is comprised of interest payments, the net annual benefit of the tax break is $16,320, or $1,360 per month.
with a simple 5% mortgage rate, the effect of removing the tax break amounts to reducing home values by $326,400, or 34%, the marginal tax rate. These are very simple assumptions; the reality of this legislative change will likely not be as severe. Higher end properties will likely be impacted the most, with falling price levels manifesting in some way throughout the entire housing market.
President Bush attempted to eliminate the mortgage tax break in 2005, but was stopped by Congress. The Obama administration tried this same legislative change with last years budget, but met similar obstacles. Given that the real estate market is in such turmoil, and that so many people gain advantage from perpetuating this tax break, it is unlikely the White House proposal will be accepted by Congress.
What Does The Mortgage Tax Break Mean For The Economy?
There is no free lunch in economics weve all heard that term, right? The same is true for tax breaks, or any legislative market manipulation. Enabling borrowers to write off interest payments from their income tax liability increases incentives to borrow money to buy real estate. This ultimately skews capital structures in that less equity investment is made with purchases relative to debt assumption. Increasing debt levels simultaneously increases prices and risk. In essence, the mortgage tax break causes housing to be over-capitalized, siphoning disproportionate capital resources from other parts of the economy.
Eliminating the tax break makes good economic sense; however, the result will inevitably be a deflation in housing prices. The magnitude of the deflation is uncertain. Given that real estate markets are already on shaky grounds, reducing, or eliminating, policies that support home prices can potentially lead to a market route.
All things considered, it is too bad President Bush was not able to repeal this tax break in 2005. That was probably the best time to moderate an over-heated market, and realign national capital resources in a relatively stable environment. We may have missed that opportunity for some time.
Posted in Investing, Politics, Real Estate
Posted on 08 April 2009. Tags: 20/20, American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, auto suppliers, bailout, bailouts and bull, banking, banks, barack obama, Big Brother, bureaucrats, Chrysler, Detroit, Early Head Start, Economics, Education, education market, Fannie Mae, FDIC, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, federal government, federal reserve, financial industry, financing, Freddie Mac, General Motors, goverment hiring, government, guerrilla, Head Start, housing, John Stosel, life insurers, market, monetary policy, mortgage, Obamanomics, oversight, Politics, pre-K, President Obama, print money, protectionism, quantitative easing, Real Estate, regulations, Rob Viglione, SEC, secondary market, soviet union, stimulus, TARP, Tim Geithner, Treasury Department, Troubled Asset Relief Program, wall street
Big Brother set to take over pre-Kindergarten education, John Stossel points out consequences of government education, $5 billion bailout unrolled for auto suppliers, government hiring Wall Street analysts caught in financial crisis, economists predict deflation will cause mortgage rates will drop to 4.2% by end of year, and Big Brother’s favorite life insurers set to receive bailouts… Continue Reading
Posted in Featured, Freedom Under Fire
Posted on 05 April 2009. Tags: agriculture, American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, Antarctica, asset bubbles, balance sheet, barack obama, Big Brother, Bill of Rights, bond maturity, bonds, budget deficit, bureaucracy, cap and trade, capital expenditures, capitalism, commodities, congress, Constitution, consumer spending, courts, currency, cut spending, DBA, DBC, debt, deflation, democracy, dependence, diversification, dividends, dollar, DOW, Economics, elections, electricity costs, energy, equities, Fannie Mae, federal reserve, federal spending, financial industry, financial regulations, fiscal policy, fixed rate debt, FNM, FRE, Freddie Mac, free enterprise, free society, GLD, gold, GSG, Health Care, hedge, housing boom, housing bust, housing is a right, inflation, interest rates, international, Investing, irrational exuberance, join a militia, junk loans, labor laws, labor market, laws, leverage, life savings, Medicaid, Medicare, military, militia, monetary policy, money supply, mortgage, nanny state, NASDAQ, national debt, natural gas, oil, police state, Politics, portfolio, portfolio management, precious metals, President Obama, public debt, quantitative easing, question assumptions, Real Estate, regulate carbon emissions, regulations, retained earnings, right to bear arms, Rob Viglione, rolling dice, S&P500, savings rate, second amendment, short stocks, short the market, short-term debt, silver, SLV, social security, socialism, stagflation, stimulus, stock market, subprime debt, TARP, Tim Geithner, TIP, Treasury, treasury inflation protected securities, trust government, union, USD, USO, velocity of money, welfare, WIP, yields
We are moving closer towards a political economy every day. Every dollar borrowed, taxed, printed, and spent by government really comes from the private sector. Trillions of dollars of national resources are being allocated by politicians and bureaucrats towards things they claim will benefit our economy. Congress just passed a $3.6 trillion budget ($1.2 trillion in deficit), and combined the Federal Reserve and Treasury have dumped $13 trillion into the economy in the last 16 months. What we must all ask ourselves right now is whether or not we trust government with our money? Continue Reading
Posted in Economics, Investing, Politics
Posted on 03 April 2009. Tags: accountability, Ahmad Tanveer, AIG, alternative economic data, america, American International Group, bail out the people, barack obama, Ben Bernanke, Big Brother, big businesses, bipartisanship, BLS, bonds, bonuses, bottomless pit, budge deficit, budget plan, Bureau of Labor Statistis, bureaucratic, capitalism must end, cato institute, chanting and drumming, collectivism, concentration camps, congress, debt, democrats, Department of Homeland Security, depression, detain immigrants, detention centers, developing world, development, development economics, DHS, economic systems, Economics, Economists' Adventures and misadventures in the tropics, employment obligations, end of American Empire, fair trade, Fannie Mae, fascism, federal reserve, financial regulations, fiscal year, FNM, FRE, Fredd Mac, free enterprise, free trade, G20, Georgia, global New Deal, Global Socialism, globalization, Goldman Sachs, Gordon Brown, Group of 20, harassed by government, Harry Reid, House of Representatives, Hugo Chavez, IMF, immigrant deaths, immigration, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, ineffective, inherited mistakes, insurance, international aid organizations, International Monetary Fund, London, mortgage giants, mortgage market, Nancy Pelosi, new york protest, New York University, New Yorker, NYU, Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight, Pakistani, Pax Americana, Politics, poor countries, President Obama, prisons, protectionism, quadrillion, real unemployment, recession, republicans, retention bonuses, Rob Viglione, Russia, secondary market, Senate, ShadowStats, socialism, spending bill, statistics, stimulus spending, summit, The Elusive Quest for Growth, The White Man's Burden, third world, Tim Geithner, trade credits, treasuries, trillion, troop withdrawals, unemployment, united states, unprecedented spending, utopia, Utopian aid plans, Venezuela, wasteful, why doesn't aid work, Why the West's Efforts to aid the rest have done so much ill and so little good, William Easterly, World Bank, world leaders
Government detention camps cover up deaths-does America have a human rights problem? Congress passes unprecedented $3.6 trillion budget with $1.2 trillion deficit, official unemployment rates his 8.5%-some economists claiming they are really upwards of 20%, government mortgage giants Fannie and Freddie to pay $159 billion in new bonuses, Obama calls end to ‘Pax Americana’, world leaders pledge $1.1 trillion to IMF, Russia refuses to remove troops from Georgia, NY protesters call for government to ‘Bail out the People’, Hugo Chavez declares that ‘Capitalism must end,’ and Treasuries drop with announcement of next week’s $59 billion note issue and Goldman Sachs estimate that government will need to borrow another $3.25 trillion this year… Continue Reading
Posted in Featured, Freedom Under Fire, Uncategorized
Posted on 11 March 2009. Tags: Alan Greenspan, capitalism, congress, default rates, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Economics, Fannie Mae, Fed, federal funds rate, federal reserve, Freddie Mac, free enterprise, free trade, global trade, globalization, housing, HUD, interest rates, montary policy, mortage industry, mortgage rates, mortgages, Politics, protectionism, Real Estate, Rob Viglione, secondary market for mortgages, socialism, speculation, subprime borrowers, subprime lending
Former Federal Reserve Chairman, Alan Greenspan, published an editorial in the Wall Street Journal today that absolves himself of any wrong-doing in the housing bubble and its subsequent destructive aftermath. Latching onto a weak argument that circa 2002 long-term mortgage and short-term federal funds rates had statistically diverged in correlation, he suggests that the overcapitalization of housing resulting from cheap credit was not his fault. Many critics have pointed the finger at Greenspan for setting short-term rates too low for too long. Access to cheap credit, according to critics, sparked “irrational exuberance” in the housing market, flooding the sector with unprecedented capital and driving prices to ridiculous levels.
Rather, Greenspan blames global trade in boosting foreign savings rates and leaving the U.S. with large current account imbalances that were subsidized by our trading partners. The current account cash flows went almost exclusively into housing, driving long-term mortgage rates to unprecedented lows and encouraging speculation.
Hilariously, in his editorial Greenspan cites famous economist Milton Friedman as saying that during Greenspan’s tenure from 1985-2005, “There is no other period of comparable length in which the Federal Reserve System has performed so well. It is more than a difference of degree; it approaches a difference of kind.”
Friedman did not live to see the aftermath of Greenspan’s policies. Short-term federal funds and long-term mortgage rates did diverge in correlation, but they did so precisely because of Fed and other governmental policies. The structural distortions in our economy leading to sustained trade imbalances were caused by irresponsible monetary and fiscal policies. Congress legislated the creation of the secondary mortgage market, mandated that it funnel capital to subprime borrowers, and taxed away America’s industrial base. Couple this with a sustained period of negative real interest rates orchistrated by Greenspan, and the U.S. economy grew ridiculously distorted over time, channeling the world’s savings towards our consumption, leaving the country bereft of productive capacity. Housing is not productive, but consumptive.
Global trade is not the problem. Current account and trade deficits, of themselves, are not the problem. Artificial interest rate manipulation, social engineering legislation that drives consumption over production, and inflationary monetary policy that drives perpetual inflation and currency debasement are the issues.
Mr. Greenspan accuses his detractors of rewriting history, but that is precisely what he is attempting to do.
Posted in Economics, Politics
Posted on 04 March 2009. Tags: A Bull in China, american lighthouse foundation, banking, banks, barack obama, Bolivarian Revolution, Book, Cargill, charities, China, Chinese consume more goods, civil war in U.S., commodities, congress, construction, currency, debasement, defend earmarks, democrats, dictator, distressed properties, dollar, domestic stimulus, drug approval, economic downturn, Fannie Mae, FDA, Food and Drug Administration, Freddie Mac, Freedom Under Fire, gold, hands of the oligarchy, health care costs, hedge inflation, high income earners, homeowners bailout, Hugo Chavez, Idiot's Guide to Buying Foreclosures, Igor Panarin, inflation, infrastructure, Investing in Real Estate Tax Liens, itemized tax deductions, Jim Rogers, judicial branch, lawmakers, lawsuits, Lefitism, liability, litigation, Marxims, Mormon cricket, mortgage intereset, mortgages, national interest, nationalized, not backed by gold, Obama administration, oppose Obama tax hikes, polynesian voyaging society, popular vote, populism, pork spending, porkulus, Pre-Foreclosure Real Estate, President Obama, progressive taxation, raw materials, Real Estate, restructure loans, Rob Viglione, Robin Hood, Ruble, Russia, Russian economist, social unrest, socialism, special interests, Spending, state and local taxes, supreme court, swine odor research, take from the rich, TARP, tatoo removal, too many dollars, Treasury securities, U.S. Treasuries, USD, Venezuela, vital, war on opposition media
China launching massive domestic stimulus, details on the $275 billion homeowner bailout, landmark Supreme Court ruling for drug makers, Chavez declares war on opposition media and nationalizes a U.S.-based company, lawmakers defend 9,000 earmarks including “swine odor research”, and a Russian economist predicts civil war in U.S. in 2009…just the latest in your Freedom Under Fire Report! Continue Reading
Posted in Featured, Freedom Under Fire
Posted on 02 March 2009. Tags: $900 million to Palestinians, adults behind bars, Afghanistan, Australia, bank Nationalists, benchmark rate, broadband internet, budget, budget growth, Bush administration, Bush memo, business expense, central bank, congress, Constitution, criminal, criminal correction, drug prohibition, economist, Fannie Mae, financial industry, Freddie Mac, free market libertarian, fuzzy math, Gaza, Governor Glenn Stevens, Hamas, Harvard, Homeowner Affordability and Stability Plan, homeowner bailout a mistake, honoraria, income tax, interest rates, iraq, Jeffrey A. Miron, Mavericks, Mayor, Medicare, mortgage industry, nationalization, NBA tickets, obama, phantom costs, police state, president bush, President Obama, prison spending, prison state, rendition powers, Rob Viglione, Ron Kirk, Senate Finance Committee, socialism, Socialist, Sweden, tax evasion, temporary nationalization turns permanent, terrorists, Texas, torture, U.S. trade representative, understate costs, unfettered, war funding, War on Drugs, war on terrorism, White House
White House budget found to have “fuzzy math” on war estimates, new role for federal government to provide broadband Internet, U.S. gives Palestinians $900 million, Harvard economist says bailing out homeowners is a mistake, 4th Obama appointee found evading taxes, bank Nationalists look to Sweden, temporary nationalization of mortgage industry now permanent, 1 in 31 adults behind bars in U.S., Australia leaves benchmark rate unchanged, and Bush memos claim unfettered rendition powers…just the latest in your Freedom Under Fire Report! Continue Reading
Posted in Featured, Freedom Under Fire
Posted on 20 February 2009. Tags: BAC, Bank of America, banking, banks, banks get slaughtered, budget defici, C, Chuck Schumer, Citigroup, congress, credit score, debt, Economics, entitlement programs, Fannie Mae, federal reserve, financial risk, fire Congress, Freddie Mac, government business model, home appraisal, House of Representatives, HUD, income documentation, interest rates, lending standards, leverage, low income housing, Medicaid, Medicare, money supply, nationalization, nationalize, Office of Housing and Urban Development, Politics, public debt, risk, Rob Viglione, Senate, Senator, social security, unfunded liabilities, Wells Fargo, WFC, wipe out shareholders, zombie banks
With all the speculation on a government takeover of the banking industry, including Alan Greenspan’s statement that “the U.S. may have to temporarily nationalize some banks until the industry is restructured,” we should do some serious soul searching. America has a long tradition of respecting property rights and restricting government power from the private domain. Overt nationalization would be unconstitutional, but change is in the air… Continue Reading
Posted in Economics, Politics
Posted on 29 September 2008. Tags: barack obama, cause of housing bust and credit crisis, community organizer, congress, Economics, failure of socialism, Fannie Mae, federal funds, financial crisis, Freddie Mac, housing bust, HUD, mortgage monopoly, obama is a socialist, stock crash
Community Organizer (CO) Barack Obama has repeatedly stated that this financial crisis proves a fundamental failure of our economic system. He’s right. Although, I doubt he realizes exactly why. CO Obama believes these hard times point to the failure of free enterprise, markets, and Capitalism. On that count, he’s incorrect…nearly treasonously so. We are witnessing the results of decades of bad government policy. Social engineering on so many convoluted levels has finally caused such a severe blow to our society that we are finally taking notice. The best explanation comes from Harvard University economist, Jeffrey A. Miron. Continue Reading
Posted in Economics, Featured, Politics, Real Estate